Guillotine Choke Incident: Man in His 20 Loses Consciousness During YouTube Livestream, Police Investigate…ZFN Terminates Contract
이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로, 이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.
As of the evening of 2026-09-07, a 36-year-old mixed martial arts fighter in Incheon is under police investigation on suspicion of using a so-called 'guillotine choke' on a man in his 20 during a YouTube livestream, causing him to lose consciousness. The victim is hospitalized and receiving treatment, and reportedly exhibited symptoms of paralysis in parts of his body. However, his exact final diagnosis, the extent of any lasting effects, and the responsibility of other people present at the scene have not yet been determined.
What Happened During the YouTube Livestream?
The focus of the ongoing police investigation is an incident that occurred at approximately 4 a.m. on 2026-09-06 at an officetel building in Cheongna-dong, Seo-gu, Incheon. The Incheon Seobu Police Station announced that it had booked mixed martial arts fighter A on suspicion of causing bodily injury and was investigating the case as of September 7.
According to information reported to police, A used a neck-compression technique known as a 'guillotine choke' on B, a man in his 20, causing B to lose consciousness. The incident was broadcast live on YouTube.
B reportedly struck the back of his head hard against the floor as he lost consciousness and collapsed. Reports based on the police investigation and livestream footage also described A slapping B's cheeks afterward and remaining at the scene without providing immediate emergency assistance.
Police launched an investigation after reviewing the footage. While assessing the victim's condition, investigators also plan to determine whether other individuals present at the scene participated in or conspired to commit the alleged offense.
An important distinction at this stage is that the opening of an investigation does not mean a final determination of criminal wrongdoing has been made. A has been formally booked on suspicion of causing bodily injury and is currently under investigation.
What Is a Guillotine Choke?
The 'guillotine choke' mentioned in this incident refers to a grappling technique in which a person wraps an arm around an opponent's neck and applies pressure. A central fact being established in this investigation is that the technique was used on a man in his 20 during a YouTube broadcast and that the man actually lost consciousness.
It would therefore be misleading to see the word 'choke' and assume this was simply an ordinary scene from a combat sports match. Police are not investigating the outcome of a sporting contest. They are investigating an incident in which a technique was used during a livestream, reportedly causing another person to lose consciousness and suffer injuries.
B also reportedly struck the back of his head against the floor as he fell unconscious. Based on the information currently available, it is not possible to determine how much of the victim's present condition was caused by pressure on his neck and how much resulted from the impact to his head.
It would therefore go beyond the verified facts to attribute the reported paralysis symptoms in parts of his body directly to a single technique as their definitive medical cause.
What Is the Victim's Current Condition?
According to information released by police as of September 7, B, the victim and a man in his 20, has been admitted to a hospital and is receiving treatment. Authorities also confirmed reports that he exhibited symptoms of paralysis in parts of his body.
However, information publicly released about the police investigation through the evening of September 7 did not definitively disclose a specific diagnosis, the exact areas affected by paralysis, the extent of recovery, or the expected duration of treatment.
It would therefore be premature to say that the victim has suffered permanent paralysis or that particular long-term complications have been confirmed. Conversely, it would also be inappropriate to downplay the incident as nothing more than a brief loss of consciousness. What can currently be confirmed is that the victim remains hospitalized for treatment and has exhibited symptoms of paralysis in parts of his body.
Police have also stated that they will continue investigating while monitoring the victim's condition. The investigation may change if additional medical findings or details about the severity of his injuries become available.
Why Did ZFN Terminate the Fighter's Contract After the Incident?
Mixed martial arts organization ZFN announced on September 7 that it had terminated its fighter contract with the athlete involved in the incident. ZFN explained that it considered the fighter's conduct during the broadcast a violation of the contractual obligation to maintain appropriate standards of conduct.
The police investigation and ZFN's contract termination are separate proceedings.
Police are investigating the alleged bodily injury and the circumstances surrounding the incident, while ZFN independently ended its contractual relationship with the fighter under the terms of their agreement. ZFN also stated that it would apply the same standards to the words and actions of its affiliated fighters.
ZFN's decision to terminate the contract therefore cannot be treated as equivalent to a criminal conviction. The organization's determination that the fighter violated contractual obligations must be distinguished from the process through which investigative authorities establish criminal responsibility.
When reports about the incident first spread on September 7, coverage focused primarily on the police investigation and the victim's condition. By that afternoon, ZFN's contract termination had become an additional development. Within a single day, the scope of confirmed developments expanded from the police investigation to disciplinary action by the fighter's organization.
What Will Police Investigate Next?
One of the next matters police have publicly identified for examination is whether other people present at the scene conspired to commit the alleged offense. The case therefore remains broader than the investigation of the single mixed martial arts fighter currently booked as a suspect.
Because the incident was captured on a YouTube livestream, police can examine the video alongside the victim's condition and the actions of people present at the scene. However, the extent of those individuals' responsibility should not be determined in advance of the investigation's findings.
There are three main issues to watch:
The victim's exact medical condition and progress during treatment
The charges applicable to fighter A and the outcome of the investigation
Whether other individuals present at the scene participated in or conspired to commit the alleged offense
As of September 7, police have publicly confirmed that the investigation is ongoing. No decision has yet been made on whether charges will be prosecuted or on ultimate legal responsibility.
Three Important Distinctions When Assessing the 'Choke Incident'
When viewed only through a short video clip or headline, this incident can easily create the impression that several matters have already been conclusively established. Separating the currently verified facts makes the situation much clearer.
First, a 36-year-old mixed martial arts fighter is under police investigation on suspicion of using a guillotine choke on a man in his 20, causing him to lose consciousness.
Second, the victim is hospitalized and receiving treatment, and reportedly exhibited symptoms of paralysis in parts of his body. However, his ultimate medical condition and any lasting effects cannot be conclusively determined from the information currently available.
Third, ZFN has terminated its contract with the fighter. This was an organizational decision based on a violation of the contractual obligation to maintain appropriate standards of conduct and is separate from any final judicial determination in the criminal case.
What needs to be confirmed next is not the further circulation of sensational footage, but the victim's condition and additional findings from the police investigation. If subsequent investigative developments change the allegations or understanding of the incident, or if new official information about the victim's condition becomes available, the existing account should be updated accordingly.
Related Articles
이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로, 이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.